Paper detail

The star formation rate and stellar mass limits for submillimetre galaxies implied by recent interferometric observations

Explaining the observed number counts of submillimetre (submm) galaxies (SMGs) has been a longstanding challenge for theoretical models. Surprisingly, recent observations have suggested that the brightest SMGs are almost exclusively multiple fainter sources blended into a single source in the single-dish surveys. This result is in contrast with the predictions of our previously presented theoretical model, which includes some effects of blending. In this Letter, we consider the implications of an upper limit on the submm flux density for the demographics of the SMG population. Using a relation amongst submm flux, star formation rate (SFR), and dust mass (M_d) from our previous work, we infer the maximum SFR for a range of flux density limits. For M_d = 2 x 10^9 (5 x 10^8) M_sun, the SFR limit that corresponds to an 870-μm flux density (S_870) limit in the range 9 - 12.5 mJy is in the range ~630 - 1400 (3600 - 7700) M_sun/yr. The SFR limit implies a correspondingly sharp, redshift-dependent cutoff in the stellar mass (M_star) function, the value of which we predict using the S_870-M_star relation predicted by our model. The M_star limit decreases with increasing redshift: for an S_870 limit of 9 - 12.5 mJy, the M_star limit ranges from ~4 - 7 x 10^12 M_sun at z ~ 1 to ~3 - 5 x 10^11 M_sun at z ~ 6. We discuss the few interferometrically detected SMGs that may be brighter than the proposed cutoff. Although such objects are certainly interesting, inferences based on such objects may not apply to most SMGs.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.