Paper detail

The Star Formation Laws of Eddington-Limited Star-Forming Disks

Two important avenues into understanding the formation and evolution of galaxies are the Kennicutt-Schmidt (KS) and Elmegreen-Silk (ES) laws. These relations connect the surface densities of gas and star formation (\sigmagas\ and \sigmastar, respectively) in a galaxy. To elucidate the KS and ES laws for disks where \sigmagas >~ 10^4 Msun pc-2}, we compute 132 Eddington-limited star-forming disk models with radii spanning tens to hundreds of parsecs. The theoretically expected slopes (approx. 1 for the KS law and approx. 0.5 for the ES relation) are relatively robust to spatial averaging over the disks. However, the star formation laws exhibit a strong dependence on opacity that separates the models by the dust-to-gas ratio that may lead to the appearance of a erroneously large slope. The total infrared luminosity (L_TIR) and multiple carbon monoxide (CO) line intensities were computed for each model. While L_TIR can yield an estimate of the average \sigmastar\ that is correct to within a factor of 2, the velocity-integrated CO line intensity is a poor proxy for the average \sigmagas\ for these warm and dense disks, making the CO conversion factor (α_CO) all but useless. Thus, observationally derived KS and ES laws at these values of \sigmagas\ that uses any transition of CO will provide a poor measurement of the underlying star formation relation. Studies of the star formation laws of Eddington-limited disks will require a high-J transition of a high density molecular tracer, as well as a sample of galaxies with known metallicity estimates.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.