Paper detail

The Star Formation-Gas Density Relation in Four Galactic GMCs: Effects of Stellar Feedback

We present maps of 4 galactic giant molecular clouds (GMCs) in the J=2-1 emission of both CO and $^{13}$CO. We use an LTE analysis to derive maps of the CO excitation temperature and column density and the distribution of total molecular gas column density, $Σ_{gas}$. The depletion of CO by freeze-out onto cold dust grains is accounted for by an approximation to the results of Lewis et al. (2021) which were derived from far-IR observations with {\it Herschel}. The surface density of young stellar objects (YSOs) is obtained from published catalogs. The mean YSO surface density exhibits a power-law dependence on $Σ_{gas}$, with exponents in the range 0.9 to 1.9. Gas column density probability distribution functions (PDFs) show power-law tails extending to high column densities. The distributions of sonic Mach number, $M_S$ are sharply peaked at $M_S \sim 5 - 8$ for 3 GMCs; a fourth has a broad distribution up to $M_S =30$, possibly a result of feedback effects from multiple OB stars. An analysis following the methodology of Pokhrel et al. (2021) finds that our sample of GMCs shows power-law relations that are somewhat shallower than found by Pokhrel et al. (2021) for the star formation rate vs. $<Σ_{gas}>$ and vs. $<Σ_{gas}>/t_{ff}$ in a different sample of clouds. We discuss possible differences in the two samples of star-forming clouds and the effects of stellar feedback on the relation between gas density and star formation rate.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.