Paper detail

The star cluster - field star connection in nearby spiral galaxies. II. Field star and cluster formation histories and their relation

Recent studies have started to cast doubt on the assumption that most stars are formed in clusters. Observational studies of field stars and star cluster systems in nearby galaxies can lead to better constraints on the fraction of stars forming in clusters. We aim to constrain the amount of star formation happening in long-lived clusters for four galaxies through the homogeneous study of field stars and star clusters. Using HST/ACS-WFPC2 images of the galaxies NGC45, NGC1313, NGC5236 and NGC7793, we estimate star formation histories by means of the synthetic CMD method. Masses and ages of star clusters are estimated using simple stellar population model fitting. Comparing observed and modeled luminosity functions we estimate cluster formation rates. By randomly sampling the stellar IMF, we construct artificial star clusters and quantify how stochastic effects influence cluster detection, integrated colors and age estimates. Star formation rates appear to be constant over the past 10-100 Myr. The number of clusters identified per galaxy varies, with few massive (>10^5Msun) and few old (>1Gyr) clusters. The galaxies NGC5236 and NGC1313 show high star and cluster formation rates compare to NGC7793 and NGC45. Stochastic sampling of the SIMF has a strong impact on estimation of ages, colors and completeness for clusters with masses <10^4Msun, while for high masses the effect is less pronounced. Stochasticity also makes size measurements highly uncertain at young ages, making it difficult to distinguish between clusters and stars based on sizes. The ratio of star formation happening in clusters compared to the global star formation ($Γ$) appears to vary for different galaxies. We find no obvious relation between $Γ$ and the star formation rate density within the range probed here. The $Γ$ values do, however, appear to correlate with the specific U-band luminosity (T_L (U)).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.