Paper detail

The stagnation point von Kármán coefficient

On the basis of various DNS of turbulent channel flows the following picture is proposed. (i) At a height y from the y = 0 wall, the Taylor microscale λis proportional to the average distance l_s between stagnation points of the fluctuating velocity field, i.e. λ(y) = B_1 l_s(y) with B_1 constant, for δ_ν<< y \lesssim δ. (ii) The number density n_s of stagnation points varies with height according to n_s = C_s y_+^{-1} / δ_ν^3 where C_s is constant in the range δ_ν<< y \lesssim δ. (iii) In that same range, the kinetic energy dissipation rate per unit mass, ε= 2/3 E_+ u_τ^3 / (κ_s y) where E_+ is the total kinetic energy per unit mass normalised by u_τ^2 and κ_s = B_1^2 / C_s is the stagnation point von Kármán coefficient. (iv) In the limit of exceedingly large Re_τ, large enough for the production to balance dissipation locally and for -<uv> ~ u_τ^2 in the range δ_ν<< y << δ, dU_+/dy ~ 2/3 E_+/(κ_s y) in that same range. (v) The von Kármán coefficient κis a meaningful and well-defined coefficient and the log-law holds only if E_+ is independent of y_+ and Re_τin that range, in which case κ~ κ_s. The universality of κ_s = B_1^2 / C_s depends on the universality of the stagnation point structure of the turbulence via B_1 and C_s, which are conceivably not universal. (vi) DNS data of turbulent channel flows which include the highest currently available values of Re_τsuggest E_+ ~ 2/3 B_4 y_+^{-2/15} and dU_+/dy_+ ~ B_4/(κ_s) y_+^{-1 - 2/15} with B_4 independent of y in δ_ν<< y << δif the significant departure from -<uv> ~ u_τ^2 is taken into account.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.