Paper detail

The Stability of Galaxy Disks

We calculate the stellar surface mass density (Sigma_*) and two-component (gas+stars) disk stability (Q_RW) for 25 late-type galaxies from the DiskMass Survey. These calculations are based on fits of a dynamical model to our ionized-gas and stellar kinematic data performed using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling of the Bayesian posterior. Marginalizing over all galaxies, we find a median value of Q_RW=2.0+/-0.9 at 1.5 scale lengths. We also find that Q_RW is anti-correlated with the star-formation rate surface density (Sigma_SFR), which can be predicted using a closed set of empirical scaling relations. Finally, we find that the star-formation efficiency (Sigma_SFR/Sigma_g) is correlated with Sigma_* and weakly anti-correlated with Q_RW. The former is consistent with an equilibrium prediction of Sigma_SFR/Sigma_g propto Sigma_*^{1/2}. Despite its order-of-magnitude range, we find no correlation of Sigma_SFR/Sigma_g/Sigma_*^{1/2} with any other physical quantity derived by our study.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.