Paper detail

The stability of extended Floater-Hormann interpolants

We present a new analysis of the stability of extended Floater-Hormann interpolants, in which both noisy data and rounding errors are considered. Contrary to what is claimed in the current literature, we show that the Lebesgue constant of these interpolants can grow exponentially with the parameters that define them, and we emphasize the importance of using the proper interpretation of the Lebesgue constant in order to estimate correctly the effects of noise and rounding errors. We also present a simple condition that implies the backward instability of the barycentric formula used to implement extended interpolants. Our experiments show that extended interpolants mentioned in the literature satisfy this condition and, therefore, the formula used to implement them is not backward stable. Finally, we explain that the extrapolation step is a significant source of numerical instability for extended interpolants based on extrapolation.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.