Paper detail

The stability and fates of hierarchical two-planet systems

We study the dynamical stability and fates of hierarchical (in semi-major axis) two-planet systems with arbitrary eccentricities and mutual inclinations. We run a large number of long-term numerical integrations and use the Support Vector Machine algorithm to search for an empirical boundary that best separates stable systems from systems experiencing either ejections or collisions with the star. We propose the following new criterion for dynamical stability: $a_{\rm out}(1-e_{\rm out})/[a_{\rm in}(1+e_{\rm in})]>2.4\left[\max(μ_{\rm in},μ_{\rm out})\right]^{1/3}(a_{\rm out}/a_{\rm in})^{1/2}+1.15$, which should be applicable to planet-star mass ratios $μ_{\rm in},μ_{\rm out}=10^{-4}-10^{-2}$, integration times up to $10^8$ orbits of the inner planet, and mutual inclinations $\lesssim40^\circ$. Systems that do not satisfy this condition by a margin of $\gtrsim0.5$ are expected to be unstable, mostly leading to planet ejections if $μ_{\rm in}>μ_{\rm out}$, while slightly favoring collisions with the star for $μ_{\rm in}<μ_{\rm out}$. We use our numerical integrations to test other stability criteria that have been proposed in the literature and show that our stability criterion performs significantly better for the range of system parameters that we have explored.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.