Paper detail

The SQL++ Query Language: Configurable, Unifying and Semi-structured

NoSQL databases support semi-structured data, typically modeled as JSON. They also provide limited (but expanding) query languages. Their idiomatic, non-SQL language constructs, the many variations, and the lack of formal semantics inhibit deep understanding of the query languages, and also impede progress towards clean, powerful, declarative query languages. This paper specifies the syntax and semantics of SQL++, which is applicable to both JSON native stores and SQL databases. The SQL++ semi-structured data model is a superset of both JSON and the SQL data model. SQL++ offers powerful computational capabilities for processing semi-structured data akin to prior non-relational query languages, notably OQL and XQuery. Yet, SQL++ is SQL backwards compatible and is generalized towards JSON by introducing only a small number of query language extensions to SQL. Recognizing that a query language standard is probably premature for the fast evolving area of NoSQL databases, SQL++ includes configuration options that formally itemize the semantics variations that language designers may choose from. The options often pertain to the treatment of semi-structuredness (missing attributes, heterogeneous types, etc), where more than one sensible approaches are possible. SQL++ is unifying: By appropriate choices of configuration options, the SQL++ semantics can morph into the semantics of existing semi-structured database query languages. The extensive experimental validation shows how SQL and four semi-structured database query languages (MongoDB, Cassandra CQL, Couchbase N1QL and AsterixDB AQL) are formally described by appropriate settings of the configuration options. Early adoption signs of SQL++ are positive: Version 4 of Couchbase's N1QL is explained as syntactic sugar over SQL++. AsterixDB will soon support the full SQL++ and Apache Drill is in the process of aligning with SQL++.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.