Paper detail

The spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in a mathematical model of cranial neural crest cell migration

Many agent-based mathematical models of cranial neural crest cell (CNCC) migration impose a binary phenotypic partition of cells into either leaders or followers. In such models, the movement of leader cells at the front of collectives is guided by local chemoattractant gradients, while follower cells behind leaders move according to local cell-cell guidance cues. Although such model formulations have yielded many insights into the mechanisms underpinning CNCC migration, they rely on fixed phenotypic traits that are difficult to reconcile with evidence of phenotypic plasticity in vivo. A later agent-based model of CNCC migration aimed to address this limitation by allowing cells to adaptively combine chemotactic and cell-cell guidance cues during migration. In this model, cell behaviour adapts instantaneously in response to environmental cues, which precludes the identification of a persistent subset of cells as leader-like over biologically relevant timescales, as observed in vivo. Here, we build on previous leader-follower and adaptive phenotype models to develop a polarity-based agent-based model of CNCC migration, in which all cells evolve according to identical rules, interact via a pairwise interaction potential, and carry polarity vectors that evolve according to a dynamical system driven by time-averaged exposure to chemoattractant gradients. Numerical simulations of this model show that a leader-follower phenotypic partition emerges spontaneously from the underlying collective dynamics of the model. Furthermore, the model reproduces behaviour that is consistent with experimental observations of CNCC migration in the chick embryo. Thus, we provide an experimentally consistent, mechanistically-grounded mathematical model that captures the emergence of leader and follower cell phenotypes without their imposition a priori.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.