Paper detail

The spectrum of Gamma-ray Burst: a clue

In this work we numerically calculate the thermal radiation efficiency of the baryonic outflow. The possible outflow acceleration in the transparent stage, which lowers thermal radiation efficiency, has been taken into account. In the standard internal shock model for the prompt emission, the fast shells should move with a typical Lorentz factor $\gtrsim 5 Γ_{\rm i}$ otherwise the GRB efficiency will be in disagreement with the observations, where $Γ_{\rm i}$ is the bulk Lorentz factor of the shocked/emitting region. The photosphere radius of these fast shells is small and the thermal radiation is too strong to be effectively outshone by the internal shock emission. This is particularly the case for some extremely bright events having $Γ_{\rm i} \sim 10^{3}$, like GRBs 080319B and 080916C. The absence of a distinct thermal component in the spectrum of most GRBs challenges the standard internal shock model and may suggest a non-baryonic (magnetic) outflow component. Though the magnetic outflow model seems favored by more and more data, it can hardly reproduce the typical GRB spectrum. In the photosphere-gradual magnetic dissipation scenario, the spectrum cuts off at $\sim 1$ GeV, too low to account for the observations of GRBs 080916C. In the sudden magnetic energy dissipation model, the low energy spectrum is expected to be $F_ν\propto ν^{-1/2}$, too soft to be consistent with the data $F_ν\propto ν^{0}$. We speculate that the low energy spectrum puzzle could be unveiled by the mechanism that particles, in the magnetic dissipation process, are repeatedly accelerated.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.