Paper detail

The spectrum of (136199) Eris between 350 and 2350 nm: Results with X-Shooter

X-Shooter is the first second-generation instrument for the ESO-VLT. It as a spectrograph covering the 300 - 2480 nm spectral range at once with a high resolving power. These properties enticed us to observe (136199) Eris during the science verification of the instrument. The target has numerous absorption features in the optical and near-infrared domain which has been observed by different authors, showing differences in their positions and strengths. We attempt at constraining the existence of super-volatiles, e.g., CH4, CO and N2, and in particular try to understand the physical-chemical state of the ices on Eris' surface. We observed Eris in the 300-2480 nm range and compared the newly obtained spectra with those available in the literature. We identified several absorption features, measuring their positions and depth and compare them with those of reflectance of pure methane ice obtained from the optical constants of this ice at 30 K to study shifts in their positions and find a possible explanation for their origin. We identify several absorption bands in the spectrum all consistent with the presence of CH4 ice. We do not identify bands related with N2 or CO. We measured the central wavelengths of the bands and find variable shifts, with respect to the spectrum of pure CH4 at 30 K. Conclusions. Based on these wavelength shifts we confirm the presence of a dilution of CH4 in other ice on the surface of Eris and the presence of pure CH4 spatially segregated. The comparison of the centers and shapes of these bands with previous works suggest that the surface is heterogeneous. The absence of the 2160 nm band of N2 can be explained if the surface temperature is below 35.6 K, the transition temperature between the alpha and beta phases of this ice. Our results, including the reanalysis of data published elsewhere, point to an heterogeneous surface on Eris.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.