Paper detail

The spectroscopic properties of the nebulae around seven Galactic and LMC Wolf-Rayet stars

We have obtained spectroscopic observations of the nebulae around seven Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars, four in the Milky Way (WR 8, 16, 18 and 40) and three in the LMC (BAT99-2, -11 and -38). They were observed using the ESO NTT with the EFOSC-2 instrument, except for one nebula, NGC 3199, which was observed using the UVES echelle spectrometer on the VLT. The aims of these observations were to (a) quantify the degree of chemical enrichment in WR nebulae which had previously been suggested to have abundances reflecting nucleosynthetic processing; and (b) to attempt to detect the far-red lines of neutral carbon (e.g. [C I] 9850A) in the nebulae around WC stars. Nebular densities, temperatures and elemental abundances were derived using standard emission line diagnostics. Our high spectral resolution UVES dataset for NGC 3199 allowed the determination of line broadening temperatures using lines from several different species. These showed consistent patterns and fair agreement with the nebular temperatures derived from diagnostic line ratios. Amongst the Galactic WR nebulae, the nebulae around WR 8, 16 and 40 were found to be strongly nitrogen-enriched while NGC 3199 displayed abundances which were similar to those of Galactic H II regions. Amongst the LMC WR nebulae, none displayed an N/O ratio that significantly exceeded LMC H II region values. The far-red [C I] lines were detected from NGC 3199, with the strength of the 8727A line indicating that at least part of it was produced by C+ recombination rather than collisional excitation. The line widths of the [C I] 9824 and 9850A lines were however the same as those of collisionally excited nebular lines, indicating that those lines originated largely from ionized regions within the nebula.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.