Paper detail

The spatial clustering of ROSAT all-sky survey Active Galactic Nuclei: V. The evolution of broad-line AGN clustering properties in the last 6 Gyr

This is the fifth paper in a series of investigations of the clustering properties of luminous, broad-emission-line active galactic nuclei (AGN) identified in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). In this work we measure the cross-correlation function (CCF) between RASS/SDSS DR14 AGN with the SDSS CMASS galaxy sample at $0.44<z<0.64$. We apply halo occupation distribution (HOD) modeling to the CCF along with the autocorrelation function of the CMASS galaxies. We find that X-ray and optically selected AGN at $0.44<z<0.64$ reside in statistically identical halos with a typical dark matter halo mass of $M_{\rm DMH}^{\rm typ,AGN} \sim 10^{12.7}\,h^{-1}\,\rm{M}_\odot$. The acceptable HOD parameter space for these two broad-line AGN samples have only statistically marginal differences caused by small deviations of the CCFs in the one-halo-dominated regime on small scales. In contrast to optically selected AGN, the X-ray AGN sample may contain a larger population of satellites at $M_{\rm DMH} \sim 10^{13}\,h^{-1}\,\rm{M}_\odot$. We compare our measurements in this work with our earlier studies at lower independent redshift ranges, spanning a look-back time of 6 Gyr. The comparison over this wider redshift range of $0.07<z<0.64$ reveals: (i) no significant difference between the typical DMH masses of X-ray and optically selected AGN, (ii) weak positive clustering dependencies of $M_{\rm DMH}^{\rm typ,AGN}$ with $L_{\rm X}$ and $M_{\rm BH}$, (iii) no significant dependence of $M_{\rm DMH}^{\rm typ,AGN}$ on Eddington ratio, and (iv) the same DMH masses host more-massive accreting black holes at high redshift than at low redshifts.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access15 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.