Paper detail

The spatial and velocity distributions of hypervelocity stars

Hypervelocity stars (HVSs) found in the Galactic halo are probably the dynamical products of interactions between (binary) stars and the massive black hole(s) (MBH) in the Galactic center (GC). It has been shown that the detected HVSs are spatially consistent with being located on two thin disks (Lu et al.), one of which has the same orientation as the clockwise-rotating stellar disk in the GC. Here we perform a large number of three-body experiments of the interactions between the MBH and binary stars bound to it, and find that the probability of ejecting HVSs is substantially enhanced by multiple encounters between the MBH and binary stars at distances substantially larger than the initial tidal breakup radii. Assuming that the HVS progenitors are originated from the two disks, the inclination distribution of the HVSs relative to the disk planes can be reproduced by either the mechanism of tidal breakup of binary stars or the mechanism of ejecting HVSs by a hypothetical binary black hole (BBH) in the GC. However, an isotropical origination of HVS progenitors is inconsistent with the observed inclination distribution. Assuming that the HVSs were ejected out by the tidal breakup mechanism, its velocity distribution can be reproduced if their progenitors diffuse onto low angular momentum orbits slowly and most of the progenitors were broken up at relatively large distances due to multiple encounters. Assuming that the HVSs were ejected out by a BBH within the allowed parameter space in the GC, our simulations produce relatively flatter velocity spectra compared to the observed ones; however, the BBH mechanism cannot be statistically ruled out, yet. Future surveys of HVSs and better statistics of their spatial and velocity distributions should enable to distinguish the ejection mechanisms of HVSs and shed new light on the dynamical environment of the MBH.(abridged)

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.