Paper detail

The Spacetime Penrose Inequality: Conditional Results for Stable MOTS and General Trapped Surfaces

We present a rigorous proof of the Spacetime Penrose Inequality relating the ADM mass to the area of trapped surfaces in asymptotically flat initial data sets satisfying the dominant energy condition. The main theorem establishes that the ADM mass is bounded below by the square root of the area divided by 16 pi for an area-maximizing marginally outer trapped surface (MOTS), subject to a distributional favorable jump condition which we prove is structurally guaranteed by KKT optimality. The extension to the outermost MOTS remains conditional on the hypothesis that the area maximizer coincides with the outermost MOTS, or equivalently on Weak Cosmic Censorship. We explicitly flag that without this condition, the proof for general trapped surfaces does not go through, as evidenced by binary merger counterexamples. We provide a complete double-limit analysis of the Agostiniani-Mazzieri-Oronzio level-set flow on the singular Jang space, resolving regularity and boundary-term obstructions. In the equality case, the initial data embed isometrically into the Schwarzschild spacetime.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.