Paper detail

The Space Distribution of the Lyman Alpha Clouds in the Line of Sight to the Z=3.66 QSO 0055-269

The spectrum of the quasar Q0055-269 ($z=3.66$) has been observed at the resolution of 14 km s$^{-1}$ in the wavelength interval 4750--6300 Å. We give a list of Lyman$-α$ lines and metal-line systems for which column densities and Doppler widths have been derived by a fitting procedure. The statistical distribution of the Doppler parameter for the Lyman$-α$ lines is peaked at $b\simeq 23$ km s$^{-1}$, with 13\% of lines with $15\leq b\leq 20$ km s$^{-1}$. The column density distribution of the Lyman$-α$ lines is described by a power-law with a break or cutoff at $\log N_{HI} \simeq 14.5$. A featureless power-law distribution is rejected with a probability of $99.94$\%. Significant clustering, with $ξ\simeq 1$ at $Δv=100$ km s$^{-1}$, is detected only for lines with $\log N_{HI}\magcir 13.8$. In addition, two voids of size $\sim 2000$ km s$^{-1}$ are found in the spectrum with a random probability of $2\times 10^{-4}$. {}From the proximity effect for lines in the interval $\log N_{HI}=13.3-14.2$ it is possible to infer an UV ionizing background $J=5\times 10^{-22}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ Hz$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$, within a factor of two from the integrated quasar contribution.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.