Paper detail

The Space Density of Redshift 5.7 Ly-Alpha Emitters

We present results from a blind, spectroscopic search for redshift 5.7 LyA emission-line galaxies at Keck I. Using a band-limiting filter and custom slitmask, the LRIS detector was covered with low resolution spectra in the 8100 - 8250 A atmospheric window which contains no bright night sky emission lines. Nine objects with line fluxes greater than our flux limit of 6e-18 erg/s/cm2 were found in the ~5.1 square arcminute field. Follow up observations indicate none of these are z=5.7 LyA emitters -- a result which places strong limits on evolution scenarios for LyA emitters between redshift 3 and redshift 5.7. In particular, the paucity of z=5.7 LyA emitters raises the question of whether the LyA -selected population plays a significant role in maintaining the ionization of the intergalactic medium at z = 5.7. We argue that if the escape fraction of LyA from galaxies is less than $0.4 f_{LyC}$, where $f_{LyC}$ is the escape fraction of Lyman continuum photons, then the star formation rate in the \lya emitting population is high enough in the no-evolution model (our upper limit) to maintain the ionization of the IGM at z=5.7.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.