Paper detail

The space density of magnetic cataclysmic variables

We use the complete, X-ray flux-limited ROSAT Bright Survey (RBS) to measure the space density of magnetic cataclysmic variables (mCVs). The survey provides complete optical identification of all sources with count rate >0.2/s over half the sky ($|b|>30^\circ$), and detected 6 intermediate polars (IPs) and 24 polars. If we assume that the 30 mCVs included in the RBS are representative of the intrinsic population, the space density of mCVs is $8^{+4}_{-2} \times 10^{-7}\,{\rmpc^{-3}}$. Considering polars and IPs separately, we find $ρ_{polar}=5^{+3}_{-2} \times 10^{-7}\,{\rm pc^{-3}}$ and $ρ_{IP}=3^{+2}_{-1} \times 10^{-7}\,{\rm pc^{-3}}$. Allowing for a 50% high-state duty cycle for polars (and assuming that these systems are below the RBS detection limit during their low states) doubles our estimate of $ρ_{polar}$ and brings the total space density of mCVs to $1.3^{+0.6}_{-0.4} \times 10^{-6}\,{\rm pc^{-3}}$. We also place upper limits on the sizes of faint (but persistent) mCV populations that might have escaped detection in the RBS. Although the large uncertainties in the $ρ$ estimates prevent us from drawing strong conclusions, we discuss the implications of our results for the evolutionary relationship between IPs and polars, the fraction of CVs with strongly magnetic white dwarfs (WDs), and for the contribution of mCVs to Galactic populations of hard X-ray sources at $L_X \ga 10^{31} {\rm erg/s}$. Our space density estimates are consistent with the very simple model where long-period IPs evolve into polars and account for the whole short-period polar population. We find that the fraction of WDs that are strongly magnetic is not significantly higher for CV primaries than for isolated WDs. Finally, the space density of IPs is sufficiently high to explain the bright, hard X-ray source population in the Galactic Centre.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.