Paper detail

The Space Density of Compton Thick AGN and the X-ray Background

We constrain the number density and evolution of Compton-thick Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN). In the local Universe we use the wide area surveys from the Swift and INTEGRAL satellites, while for high redshifts we explore candidate selections based on a combination of X-ray and mid-IR parameters. We find a significantly lower space density of Compton-thick AGN in the local Universe than expected from published AGN population synthesis models to explain the X-ray background. This can be explained by the numerous degeneracies in the parameters of those models; we use the high-energy surveys described here to remove those degeneracies. We show that only direct observations of CT AGN can currently constrain the number of heavily-obscured supermassive black holes. At high redshift, the inclusion of IR-selected Compton-thick AGN candidates leads to a much higher space density, implying (a) a different (steeper) evolution for these sources compared to less-obscured AGN, (b) that the IR selection includes a large number of interlopers, and/or (c) that there is a large number of reflection-dominated AGN missed in the INTEGRAL and Swift observations. The contribution of CT AGN to the X-ray background is small, ~9%, with a comparable contribution to the total cosmic accretion, unless reflection-dominated CT AGN significantly outnumber transmission-dominated CT AGN, in which case their contribution can be much higher. Using estimates derived here for the accretion luminosity over cosmic time we estimate the local mass density in supermassive black holes and find a good agreement with available constraints for an accretion efficiency of ~10%. Transmission-dominated CT AGN contribute only ~8% to total black hole growth.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.