Paper detail

The space $ω^*$ and the reconstruction of normality

The topological reconstruction problem asks how much information about a topological space can be recovered from its point-complement subspaces. If the whole space can be recovered in this way, it is called reconstructible. Our main result states that it is independent of the axioms of set theory (ZFC) whether the Stone-Cech remainder of the integers $ω^*$ is reconstructible. Our second result is about the reconstruction of normality. We show that assuming the Continuum Hypothesis, the compact Hausdorff space $ω^*$ has a non-normal reconstruction, namely the space $ω^* \setminus \{p\}$ for a $P$-point $p$ of $ω^*$. More generally, we show that the existence of an uncountable cardinal $κ$ satisfying $κ= κ^{<κ}$ implies that there is a normal space with a non-normal reconstruction. These results demonstrate that consistently, the property of being a normal space is not reconstructible. Whether normality is non-reconstructible in ZFC remains an open question.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.