Paper detail

The Sp(1)-Kepler Problems

Let $n\ge 2$ be a positive integer. To each irreducible representation $σ$ of $\mathrm{Sp}(1)$, an $\mathrm{Sp}(1)$-Kepler problem in dimension $(4n-3)$ is constructed and analyzed. This system is super integrable and when $n=2$ it is equivalent to a generalized MICZ-Kepler problem in dimension five. The dynamical symmetry group of this system is $\widetilde {\mathrm O}^*(4n)$ with the Hilbert space of bound states ${\mathscr H}(σ)$ being the unitary highest weight representation of $\widetilde {\mathrm {O}^*}(4n)$ with highest weight $$(\underbrace{-1, ..., -1}_{2n-1}, -(1+\barσ)),$$ which occurs at the right-most nontrivial reduction point in the Enright-Howe-Wallach classification diagram for the unitary highest weight modules. Here $\barσ$ is the highest weight of $σ$. Furthermore, it is shown that the correspondence $σ\leftrightarrow \mathscr H(σ)$ is the theta-correspondence for dual pair $(\mathrm{Sp}(1), \mathrm{O}^*(4n))\subseteq\mathrm{Sp}_{8n}(\mathbb R)$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.