Paper detail

The solution to an open problem for a caching game

In a caching game introduced by Alpern et al., a Hider who can dig to a total fixed depth normalized to $1$ buries a fixed number of objects among $n$ discrete locations. A Searcher who can dig to a total depth of $h$ searches the locations with the aim of finding all of the hidden objects. If he does so, he wins, otherwise the Hider wins. This zero-sum game is complicated to analyze even for small values of its parameters, and for the case of $2$ hidden objects has been completely solved only when the game is played in up to $3$ locations. For some values of $h$ the solution of the game with $2$ objects hidden in $4$ locations is known, but the solution in the remaining cases was an open question recently highlighted by Fokkink et al. Here we solve the remaining cases of the game with $2$ objects hidden in $4$ locations. We also give some more general results for the game, in particular using a geometrical argument to show that when there are $2$ objects hidden in $n$ locations and $n \rightarrow \infty$, the value of the game is asymptotically equal to $h/n$ for $h \ge n/2$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.