Paper detail

The Solar Minimum Eclipse of 2019 July 2: II. The First Absolute Brightness Measurements and MHD Model Predictions of Fe X, XI and XIV out to 3.4 Rs

We present the spatially resolved absolute brightness of the Fe X, Fe XI and Fe XIV visible coronal emission lines from 1.08 to 3.4 $R_\odot$, observed during the 2019 July 2 total solar eclipse (TSE). The morphology of the corona was typical of solar minimum, with a dipole field dominance showcased by large polar coronal holes and a broad equatorial streamer belt. The Fe XI line is found to be the brightest, followed by Fe X and Fe XIV (in disk $B_\odot$ units). All lines had brightness variations between streamers and coronal holes, where Fe XIV exhibited the largest variation. However, Fe X remained surprisingly uniform with latitude. The Fe line brightnesses are used to infer the relative ionic abundances and line of sight averaged electron temperature ($T_e$) throughout the corona, yielding values from 1.25 - 1.4 MK in coronal holes up to 1.65 MK in the core of streamers. The line brightnesses and inferred $T_e$ values are then quantitatively compared to the PSI Magnetohydrodynamic model prediction for this TSE. The MHD model predicted the Fe lines rather well in general, while the forward modeled line ratios slightly underestimated the observationally inferred $T_e$ within 5 to 10 % averaged over the entire corona. Larger discrepancies in the polar coronal holes may point to insufficient heating and/or other limitations in the approach. These comparisons highlight the importance of TSE observations for constraining models of the corona and solar wind formation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.