Paper detail

The solar diameter series of the CCD Solar Astrolabe of the Observatório Nacional in Rio de Janeiro measured during cycle 23

The interest on the solar diameter variations has been primary since the scientific revolution for different reasons: first the elliptical orbits found by Kepler in 1609 was confirmed in the case of the Earth, and after the intrinsic solar variability was inspected to explain the climate changes. The CCD Solar Astrolabe of the Observatório Nacional in Rio de Janeiro made daily measurements of the solar semi-diameter from 1998 to 2009, covering most of the cycle 23, and they are here presented with the aim to evidence the observed variations. Some instrumental effects parametrizations have been used to eliminate the biases appeared in morning/afternoon data reduction. The coherence of the measurements and the influence of atmospheric effects are presented, to discuss the reliability of the observed variations of the solar diameter. Their amplitude is compatible with other ground-based and satellite data recently published.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.