Paper detail

The soft component and the iron line as signatures of the disc inner radius in Galactic black hole binaries

The inner radius of the accretion disc around a black hole in the low/hard state can be measured in one of two ways. Firstly, via the extent of broadening of the iron emission line, and secondly, from the luminosity and temperature of the weak soft component seen in this state, assuming it is the disc. We use both of these methods on all the low/hard state spectra taken in timing mode of XMM-Newton's EPIC-pn. We find that the two methods are not consistent with each other, and the difference is not always in a single direction. The two methods are neither model independent, nor are they independent of current calibration issues. We find that the remaining small residuals in the EPIC-pn timing mode response at the <3% level can have a dramatic effect on the fit parameters for the reflected spectrum. There is also a mismatch in cross-calibration with RXTE, which makes it difficult to use simultaneous data to extend the bandpass of the spectral fits. Nonetheless, it is clear from the data that the iron line is noticeably broader and stronger at higher L/LEdd, which is consistent with the truncated disc models. We also show that it is likely that the soft component changes character, from a stable component consistent with a truncated disc at high L/LEdd, to a variable one with much smaller radius at low L/LEdd. This adds to growing evidence for a complex soft component in the low/hard state, possibly resulting from clumps torn from the edge of the truncated disc.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.