Paper detail

The SN 2008S Progenitor Star: Gone or Again Self-Obscured?

We obtained late-time optical and near-IR imaging of SN 2008S with the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT). We find that (1) it is again invisible at optical (UBVR) wavelengths to magnitude limits of approximately 25 mag, and (2) while detected in the near-IR (HK) at approximately 20 mag, it is fading rapidly. The near-IR detections in March and May 2010 are consistent with dust emission at a blackbody temperature of T ~ 900 K and a total luminosity of L ~ 40000 Lsun, comparable to the luminosity of the obscured progenitor star. If it is a supernova, the near-IR emission is likely due to shock heated dust since the elapsed time from peak is too long to support a near-IR dust echo and the decline in luminosity is shallower than the 56Co slope. If it is reprocessed emission from a surviving progenitor, a dust photosphere must have reestablished itself closer to the star than before the transient (~40 AU rather than 150 AU), unless there is a second, cooler dust component that dominates at mid-IR wavelengths. The continued rapid fading at roughly constant temperature favors transient emission, but the SED peaks in the mid-IR and future Spitzer observations will be needed to close the case.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.