Paper detail

The Smallest SU($N$) Hadrons

If new physics contains new, heavy strongly-interacting particles belonging to irreducible representations of SU(3) different from the adjoint or the (anti)fundamental, it is a non-trivial question to calculate what is the minimum number of quarks/antiquarks/gluons needed to form a color-singlet bound state ("hadron"), or, perturbatively, to form a gauge-invariant operator, with the new particle. Here, I prove that for an SU(3) irreducible representation with Dynkin label $(p,q)$, the minimal number of quarks needed to form a product that includes the (0,0) representation is $2p+q$. I generalize this result to SU($N$), with $N>3$. I also calculate the minimal total number of quarks/antiquarks/gluons that, bound to a new particle in the $(p,q)$ representation, give a color-singlet state, or, equivalently, the smallest-dimensional gauge-invariant operator that includes quark/antiquark/gluon fields and the new strongly-interacting matter field. Finally, I list all possible values of the electric charge of the smallest hadrons containing the new exotic particles, and discuss constraints from asymptotic freedom both for QCD and for grand unification embeddings thereof.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.