Paper detail

The smallest sets of points not determined by their X-rays

Let $F$ be an $n$-point set in $\mathbb{K}^d$ with $\mathbb{K}\in\{\mathbb{R},\mathbb{Z}\}$ and $d\geq 2$. A (discrete) X-ray of $F$ in direction $s$ gives the number of points of $F$ on each line parallel to $s$. We define $ψ_{\mathbb{K}^d}(m)$ as the minimum number $n$ for which there exist $m$ directions $s_1,...,s_m$ (pairwise linearly independent and spanning $\mathbb{R}^d$) such that two $n$-point sets in $\mathbb{K}^d$ exist that have the same X-rays in these directions. The bound $ψ_{\mathbb{Z}^d}(m)\leq 2^{m-1}$ has been observed many times in the literature. In this note we show $ψ_{\mathbb{K}^d}(m)=O(m^{d+1+\varepsilon})$ for $\varepsilon>0$. For the cases $\mathbb{K}^d=\mathbb{Z}^d$ and $\mathbb{K}^d=\mathbb{R}^d$, $d>2$, this represents the first upper bound on $ψ_{\mathbb{K}^d}(m)$ that is polynomial in $m$. As a corollary we derive bounds on the sizes of solutions to both the classical and two-dimensional Prouhet-Tarry-Escott problem. Additionally, we establish lower bounds on $ψ_{\mathbb{K}^d}$ that enable us to prove a strengthened version of Rényi's theorem for points in $\mathbb{Z}^2$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.