Paper detail

The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. IV: the mass density profile of early-type galaxies out to 100 effective radii

We present a weak gravitational lensing analysis of 22 early-type strong lens galaxies, based on deep HST images obtained as part of the Sloan Lens ACS Survey. Using the most advanced techniques to control systematic uncertainties related to the variable PSF and charge transfer efficiency of the ACS, we detect weak lensing signal out to 300 kpc/h. We analyze blank control fields from the COSMOS survey in the same manner, inferring that the residual systematic uncertainty in the tangential shear is <0.3%. A joint strong and weak lensing analysis shows that the average total mass density profile is consistent with isothermal over two decades in radius (3-300 kpc/h, approximately 1-100 Reff). This finding extends by over an order of magnitude in radius previous results, based on strong lensing and/or stellar dynamics, that luminous and dark component ``conspire'' to form an isothermal mass distribution. In order to disentangle the contributions of luminous and dark matter, we fit a two-component mass model (R^1/4 + NFW) to the weak and strong lensing constraints. It provides a good fit to the data with only two free parameters; i) the average stellar mass-to-light ratio M_*/L_V=4.48 +- 0.46 hMo/Lo, in agreement with that expected for an old stellar population; ii) the average virial mass-to-light ratio M_vir/L_V = 246+101-87 hMo/Lo. [abridged]

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.