Paper detail

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: An Investigation of Biases in CIV Emission-Line Properties

We investigate the dependence on data quality of quasar properties measured from the CIV emission line region at high redshifts. Our measurements come from 32 epochs of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Reverberation Mapping Project spectroscopic observations of 482 z>1.46 quasars. We compare the differences between measurements made from the single-epoch and coadded spectra, focusing on the CIV emission line because of its importance for studies of high-redshift quasar demographics and physical properties, including black hole masses. In addition to statistical errors increasing (by factors of ~2-4), we find increasing systematic offsets with decreasing S/N. The systematic difference (measurement uncertainty) in our lowest S/N (<5) subsample between the single-epoch and coadded spectrum (i) CIV equivalent width is 17A (31A), (ii) centroid wavelength is <1A (2A), and fractional velocity widths, Delta V/V, characterized by (iii) the line dispersion, sigma_l, is 0.104 (0.12), and (iv) the mean absolute deviation (MAD) is 0.072 (0.11). These remain smaller than the 1-sigma measurement uncertainties for all subsamples considered. The MAD is found to be the most robust line-width characterization. Offsets in the CIV full-width at half maximum (FWHM) velocity width and the CIV profile characterized by FWHM/sigma_l are only smaller than the statistical uncertainties when S/N>10, although offsets in lower S/N spectra exceed the statistical uncertainties by only a factor of ~1.5. Characterizing the CIV line profile by the kurtosis is the least robust property investigated, as the median systematic coadded--single-epoch measurement differences are larger than the statistical uncertainties for all S/N subsamples.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.