Paper detail

The skewness of z=0.5 redshift-space galaxy distribution in Modified Gravity

We study the reduced skewness, $S_{3,g}\equiv\barξ_{3,g}/\barξ_{2,g}^2$ of galaxy distribution at $z=0.5$ in two families of modfied gravity models: the Hu-Sawicki $f(R)$-gravity and normal-branch of Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (nDGP) models. We use a set of mock galaxy catalogues specifally designed to match CMASS spectroscopic galaxy sample. For the first time we investigate the third reduced moment of such galaxy distributions both in the redshift space. Our analysis confirms that the signal previously indicated only for dark matter halo catalogues persists also in realistic mock galaxy samples. This result offers a possibility to extract a potential modified gravity signal in $S_3$ from spectroscopic galaxy data without a need for a very precise and self-consistent RSD models constructed for each and every modified gravity scenario separately. We show that the relative deviations from $Λ$CDM~ $S_{3,g}$ of various modified gravity models can vary from $7$ down to $\sim 2-3\%$ effects. Albeit, the effect looks small, we show that for considered models it can foster a $2-3σ$ falsification. Finally we argue that galaxy sample of a significantly higher number density should provide even stronger constraints by limiting shot-noise effects affecting the $S_{3,g}$ estimates at small comoving separations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.