Paper detail

The skewness and kurtosis of the projected density distribution function: validity of perturbation theory

We study the domain of validity of Perturbation Theory (PT), by comparing its predictions for the reduced skewness, s_3, and kurtosis, s_4, of the projected cosmological density field, with the results of N-body simulations. We investigate models with different linear power spectra and consider as physical applications both angular galaxy catalogues and weak lensing surveys. We first find that the small-angle approximation for the predicted skewness provides a good match to the exact numerical PT results. On the other hand, results from non-linear simulated catalogues agree well with PT results on quasi-linear angular scales, which correspond to scales larger than about 1 degree in the applications we have considered. We also point out that, on smaller scale, the projection effects tend to attenuate the effects of the strong nonlinearities in the angular skewness and kurtosis.

preprint1997arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.