Paper detail

The Sketching Complexity of Graph Cuts

We study the problem of sketching an input graph, so that given the sketch, one can estimate the weight of any cut in the graph within factor $1+ε$. We present lower and upper bounds on the size of a randomized sketch, focusing on the dependence on the accuracy parameter $ε>0$. First, we prove that for every $ε> 1/\sqrt n$, every sketch that succeeds (with constant probability) in estimating the weight of all cuts $(S,\bar S)$ in an $n$-vertex graph (simultaneously), must be of size $Ω(n/ε^2)$ bits. In the special case where the sketch is itself a weighted graph (which may or may not be a subgraph) and the estimator is the sum of edge weights across the cut in the sketch, i.e., a cut sparsifier, we show the sketch must have $Ω(n/ε^2)$ edges, which is optimal. Despite the long sequence of work on graph sparsification, no such lower bound was known on the size of a cut sparsifier. We then design a randomized sketch that, given $ε\in(0,1)$ and an edge-weighted $n$-vertex graph, produces a sketch of size $\tilde O(n/ε)$ bits, from which the weight of any cut $(S,\bar S)$ can be reported, with high probability, within factor $1+ε$. The previous upper bound is $\tilde O(n/ε^2)$ bits, which follows by storing a cut sparsifier (Bencz{ú}r and Karger, 1996). To obtain this improvement, we critically use both that the sketch need only be correct on each fixed cut with high probability (rather than on all cuts), and that the estimation procedure of the data structure can be arbitrary (rather than a weighted subgraph). We also show a lower bound of $Ω(n/ε)$ bits for the space requirement of any data structure achieving this guarantee.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.