Paper detail

The Sizes of $z\sim9-10$ Galaxies Identified in the BoRG Survey

Redshift $z=9--10$ object selection is the effective limit of Hubble Space Telescope imaging capability, even when confirmed with Spitzer. If only a few photometry data points are available, it becomes attractive to add criteria based on their morphology in these J- and H-band images. One could do so through visual inspection, a size criterion, or alternate morphometrics. We explore a vetted sample of BoRG $z\sim9$ and $z\sim10$ candidate galaxies and the object rejected by Morishita+ (2018) to explore the utility of a size criterion in z=9-10 candidate selection. A stringent, PSF-corrected effective radius criterion ($r_e<0\farcs3$) would result in the rejection of 65-70\% of the interlopers visually rejected by Morishita+. It may also remove up to $\sim20$\% of bona-fide brightest ($L>>L^*$) z=9 or 10 candidates from a BoRG selected sample based on the Mason+ (2015) luminosity functions, assuming the Holwerda+ (2015) $z\sim9$ size-luminosity relation. We argue that including a size constraint in lieu of a visual inspection may serve in wide-field searches for these objects in e.g. EUCLID or HST archival imaging with the understanding that some brightest ($L>>L^*$) candidates may be missed. The sizes of the candidates found by Morishita+ (2018) follow the expected size distribution of $z\sim9$ for bright galaxies, consistent with the lognormal in Shibuya+ (2015) and single objects. Two candidates show high star-formation surface density ($Σ_{SFR} > 25 M_\odot/kpc^2$) and all merit further investigation and follow-up observations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.