Paper detail

The Sizes of Candidate $z\sim9-10$ Galaxies: confirmation of the bright CANDELS sample and relation with luminosity and mass

Recently, a small sample of six $z\sim9-10$ candidates was discovered in CANDELS that are $\sim10-20\times$ more luminous than any of the previous $z\sim9-10$ galaxies identified over the HUDF/XDF and CLASH fields. We measure the sizes of these candidates to map out the size evolution of galaxies from the earliest observable times. Their sizes are also used to provide a valuable constraint on whether these unusual galaxy candidates are at high redshift. Using galfit to derive sizes from the CANDELS F160W images of these candidates, we find a mean size of 0.13$\pm$0.02" (or 0.5$\pm$0.1 kpc at $z\sim9-10$). This handsomely matches the 0.6 kpc size expected extrapolating lower redshift measurements to $z\sim9-10$, while being much smaller than the 0.59" mean size for lower-redshift interlopers to $z\sim9-10$ photometric selections lacking the blue IRAC color criterion. This suggests that source size may be an effective constraint on contaminants from $z\sim9-10$ selections lacking IRAC data. Assuming on the basis of the strong photometric evidence that the Oesch et al. 2014 sample is entirely at $z\sim9-10$, we can use this sample to extend current constraints on the size-luminosity, size-mass relation, and size evolution of galaxies to $z\sim10$. We find that the $z\sim9-10$ candidate galaxies have broadly similar sizes and luminosities as $z\sim6$-8 counterparts with star-formation-rate surface densities in the range of $\rm Σ_{SFR}=1-20\, M_\odot~ yr^{-1}\, kpc^{-2}$. The stellar mass-size relation is uncertain, but shallower than those inferred for lower-redshift galaxies. In combination with previous size measurements at z=4-7, we find a size evolution of $(1+z)^{-m}$ with $m=1.0\pm0.1$ for $>0.3L^*_{z=3}$ galaxies, consistent with the evolution previously derived from $2 < z < 8$ galaxies.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.