Paper detail

The size of the Universe according to the Poincare dodecahedral space hypothesis

One of the FLRW models that best fits the WMAP sky maps of the CMB is the Poincare dodecahedral space. The optimal fit of this model to WMAP data was recently found using an optimal cross-correlation method, but the systematic error in the estimate of the matched-circle angular radius α, or equivalently, the (comoving) size of the Universe 2\rinj (twice the injectivity radius), might be much higher than the random error. In order to increase the falsifiability of the model, it would be useful to reduce the uncertainty in this estimate and to estimate the fraction of the sky where multiply imaged gravitationally bound objects should potentially be detectable. "Matched discs" are defined in order to describe a useful subset of multiply imaged objects. The cross-correlation method at \ltapprox 1 \hGpc is applied to WMAP 7-year data in order to improve the estimate of α. The improved matched-circle radius estimate is α= 23 \pm 1.4 deg, where the uncertainty represents systematic error dependent on the choices of galactic mask and all-sky map. This is equivalent to 2\rinj = 18.2\pm 0.5 \hGpc for matter density parameter Omega_m=0.28\pm 0.02. The lowest redshift of multiply imaged objects is z=106\pm18. Multiply imaged high overdensity (rare) peaks visible during 200>z>106 should be present in matched discs of radius 14.8\pm2.3 deg. The accuracy in the matched circle radius estimate is considerably improved by using the higher resolution signal. The predicted matched discs (over 200>z>106) project to about 20% of the full sky. Since any object located exactly in the discs would be multiply imaged at equal redshifts, evolutionary effects would be small for objects that are nearly located in the discs.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.