Paper detail

The size of the accretion region in intermediate polars: eclipses of XY Arietis observed with RXTE

RXTE observed 20 eclipse egresses of the intermediate polar XY Ari in order to study the size and structure of the X-ray emitting accretion regions. The spin-phase averaged egress lasts 26 s, implying a white dwarf radius of 4.3-7.0 10^8 cm. The individual egresses occur later in orbital phase with later spin phase, as expected if the white dwarf spins in the same sense as the orbital motion. The eclipse times trace out the motion of the upper pole across the white dwarf face; then, when the upper pole disappears over the white dwarf limb and the lower pole appears, they trace the motion of the lower pole across the face. Aligning all the egresses shows that the majority of the X-ray flux emerges in <2 s, implying accretion regions with area, f, < 0.002 as a fraction of the white dwarf surface. Using only the spin-phase to align the egresses, however, gives a longer (~5 s) time for the emergence of the majority of the flux, implying that the accretion regions wander over an area of f < 0.01. There is also evidence that a minority of the flux emerges from a much larger area, or that we see accretion regions at both poles simultaneously at some spin phases.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.