Paper detail

The size-frequency distribution of H>13 NEOs and ARM targets detected by Pan-STARRS1

We determine the absolute magnitude (H) distribution (or size-frequency distribution, SFD; $N(H) \propto 10^{αH}$ where $α$ is the slope of the distribution) for near-Earth objects (NEO) with $13<H<30$ and Asteroid Retrieval Mission (ARM) targets with $27<H<31$ that were detected by the 1\st\ telescope of the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System - Pan-STARRS1 (e.g. Kaiser et al. 2002, Kaiser 2004, Hodapp et al. 2004). The NEO and ARM target detection efficiencies were calculated using the Greenstreet et al. (2012) NEO orbit distribution. The debiased Pan-STARRS1 NEO absolute magnitude distribution is more complex than a single slope power law - it shows two transitions - at H$\sim$16 from steep to shallow slope, and in the $21<H<23$ interval from a shallow to steep slope, which is consistent with other recent works (e.g. Mainzer et al. 2011c, Brown et al. 2013, Harris and D`Abramo 2015). We fit $α= 0.48\pm0.02$ for NEOs with $13<H<16$, $α= 0.33\pm0.01$ for NEOs with $16<H<22$, and $α= 0.62\pm0.03$ for the smaller objects with $H>22$. There is also another change in slope from steep to shallow around H=27. The three ARM target candidates detected by Pan-STARRS1 in one year of surveying have a corrected SFD with slope $α= 0.40^{+0.33}_{-0.45}$. We also show that the window for follow up observations of small (H$\gtrsim$22) NEOs with the NASA IRTF telescope and Arecibo and Goldstone radars are extremely short - on order of days, and procedures for fast response must be implemented in order to measure physical characteristics of small Earth-approaching objects. CFHT's MegaCam and Pan-STARRS1 have longer observing windows and are capable of following-up more NEOs due to their deeper limiting magnitudes and wider fields of view.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.