Paper detail

The Šilov Boundary for Operator Spaces

Motivated by the recent interest in the examination of unital completely positive maps and their effects in C*-theory, we revisit an older result concerning the existence of the Šilov ideal. The direct proof of Hamana's theorem for the existence of an injective envelope for a unital operator subspace X of some B(H) that we provide implies that the Šilov ideal is the intersection of C*(X) with any maximal boundary operator subsystem in B(H). As an immediate consequence we deduce that the Šilov ideal is the biggest boundary operator subsystem for X in C*(X). The new proof of the existence of the Šilov ideal that we give does not use the existence of maximal dilations, provided by Dritschel and McCullough, and so it is independent of the one given by Arveson. As a countereffect, the Šilov ideal can be seen as the set that contains the abnormalities in a C*-cover (C,ι) of X for all the extensions of the identity map on ι(X). The interpretation of our results in terms of ucp maps characterizes the maximal boundary subsystems of X in B(H) as kernels of X-projections that induce completely minimal X-seminorms; equivalently, X-minimal projections with range being an injective envelope, that we view from now on as the Šilov boundary for X.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.