Paper detail

The signature of line graphs and power trees

Let $G$ be a graph and let $A(G)$ be the adjacency matrix of $G$. The signature $s(G)$ of $G$ is the difference between the positive inertia index and the negative inertia index of $A(G)$. Ma et al. [Positive and negative inertia index of a graph, Linear Algebra and its Applications 438(2013)331-341] conjectured that $-c_3(G)\leq s(G)\leq c_5(G),$ where $c_3(G)$ and $c_5(G)$ respectively denote the number of cycles in $G$ which have length $4k+3$ and $4k+5$ for some integers $k \ge 0$, and proved the conjecture holds for trees, unicyclic or bicyclic graphs. It is known that $s(G)=0$ if $G$ is bipartite, and the signature is closely related to the odd cycles or nonbipartiteness of a graph from the existed results. In this paper we show that the conjecture holds for the line graph and power trees.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.