Paper detail

The Signature of Galactic Tides in Local Group Dwarf Spheroidals

(Abridged) We use N-body simulations to explore the effects of tidal stripping on the structure of dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSphs). We model dSphs as King spheres embedded in NFW dark halos that orbit the Galactic potential on eccentric orbits. We find that episodes of stellar mass loss remove the initial cutoff of the bound stellar core. Once equilibrium has been re-established the outer mass profile approaches a power-law in projection that is well described by a simple Plummer model. Tides also result in transient features in the outer density profile. As the system re-equilibrates, an outward-moving "excess" of stars is found at radii where the local crossing time exceeds the time elapsed since pericenter. If the orbit is known, these results provide a simple way to assess whether "breaks" and "bumps" in the profile of dSphs are actually tidal in origin. We apply this to the Sagittarius dwarf and, encouragingly, identify two features in the profile that may be traced to its two last pericentric passages. Applied to Leo I, we find that any tidal break would locate beyond the area surveyed by current data, casting doubt on recent claims of the detection of tidal debris around this galaxy. For Carina, the tidal break should occur at a radius twice farther than observed, suggesting that the outer excess of stars is not tidal in origin unless its orbit is in error. A similar comment applies to Sculptor, whose pericenter appears too large for Galactic tides to be important but whose outer profile, like that of Draco, nonetheless follows closely a Plummer-law. Fornax and Leo II show no sign of a power-law outer profile, suggesting that they have not suffered stellar tidal stripping. Published profiles for other, fainter Milky Way dSph companions do not extend sufficiently far to allow for conclusive assessment.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.