Paper detail

The short-period limit of contact binaries

The stability of mass transfer is important in the formation of contact binaries from detached binaries when the primaries of the initially detached binaries fill their Roche lobes. Using Eggleton's stellar evolution code, we investigate the formation and the short-period limit of contact binaries by considering the effect of the instability of mass transfer. It is found that with decreasing initial primary mass from 0.89M$_{\rm \odot}$ to 0.63M$_{\rm \odot}$, the range of the initial mass ratio decreases for detached binaries that experience stable mass transfer and evolve into contact. If the initial primary mass is less than 0.63M$_{\rm \odot}$, detached binaries would experience dynamically unstable mass transfer when the primaries of detached binaries fill their Roche lobes. These systems would evolve into a common envelope situation and probably then to a complete merger of two components on a quite short timescale. This results in a low mass limit at about 0.63M$_{\rm \odot}$ for the primary mass of contact binaries, which might be a main reason why the period distribution of contact binaries has a short limit of about 0.22 days. By comparing the theoretical period distribution of contact binaries with the observational data, it is found that the observed contact binaries are above the low mass limit for the primary mass of contact binaries and no observed contact binaries are below this limit. This suggests that the short-period limit of contact binaries can be explained by the instability of the mass transfer that occurs when the primaries of the initially detached binaries fill their Roche lobes.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.