Paper detail

The Shifted Peak: Resolving Nearly Degenerate Particles at the LHC

We propose a method for determining the mass difference between two particles, \slep_1 and \slep_2, that are nearly degenerate, with Δ{m}, defined as m_2-m_1, being much less than m_1. This method applies when (a) the \slep_1 momentum can be measured, (b) \slep_2 can only decay to \slep_1, and (c) \slep_1 and \slep_2 can be produced in the decays of a common mother particle. For small Δ{m}, \slep_2 cannot be reconstructed directly, because its decay products are too soft to be detected. Despite this, we show that the existence of \slep_2 can be established by observing the shift in the mother particle invariant-mass peak, when reconstructed from decays to \slep_2. We show that measuring this shift would allow us to extract Δ{m}. As an example, we study supersymmetric gauge-gravity hybrid models in which \slep_1 is a meta-stable charged slepton next-to-lightest supersymmetric particle and \slep_2 is the next-to-lightest slepton with Δ{m} of about 5 GeV.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.