Paper detail

The shearing sheet and swing amplification revisited

The principal results of the classic analysis of the shearing sheet and swing amplification by Julian & Toomre (1966) are re-derived in a more accessible way and then used to gain a better quantitative understanding of the dynamics of stellar discs. The axisymmetric limit of the shearing sheet is derived and used to re-derive Kalnajs' 1965 dispersion relation and Toomre's 1964 stability criterion for axisymmetric disturbances. Using the shearing sheet to revisit Toomre's important 1969 paper on the group velocity implied by Lin-Shu-Kalnajs dispersion relation, we discover that two rather than one wavepackets emerges inside corotation: one each side of the inner Lindblad resonance. Although LSK dispersion relation provides useful interpretations of both wavepackets, the shearing sheet highlights the limitations of the LSK approach to disc dynamics. Disturbances by no means avoid an annulus around corotation, as the LSK dispersion relation implies. While disturbances of the shearing sheet have a limited life in real space, they live on much longer in velocity space, which Gaia allows us to probe extensively. C++ code is provided to facilitate applications of winding spiral waves.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.