Paper detail

The Shapes of Galaxy Clusters

We have reanalyzed a data set of 99 low redshift ($ z < 0.1 $) Abell clusters and determined their shapes. For this, three different measures are used. We use Monte-Carlo simulations to investigate the errors in the methods. The corrected distribution of cluster ellipticities shows a peak at $ ε\sim 0.4 $ and extends to $ ε\sim 0.8 $. The results are self-consistent, i.e., with the corrected distribution over projected cluster shapes we can reconstruct the observed distribution and the observed relation between the number of galaxies in a cluster and its ellipticity. It is shown that the richer clusters are intrinsically more nearly spherical than the poorer ones. The corrected distribution of cluster shapes is more consistent with a prolate population than with an oblate population. We compare the corrected true distribution of (projected) ellipticities with predictions from N-body simulations. For this, we use a catalogue of 75 N-body simulated clusters (van Kampen 1994) which assume a CDM spectrum with $ Ω= 1.0 $. The simulations include a recipe for galaxy formation and merging. 'Observing' these simulated clusters produces an ellipticity distribution that extends to much higher $ ε$ and that has too few nearly spherical clusters. Preliminary results of simulations of the formation of clusters in an $ Ω= 0.2 $ universe suggest that, on average, clusters are more nearly spherical in this case.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.