Paper detail

The Shape of X-ray Cavities in Galaxy Clusters: Probing Jet Properties and Viscosity

X-ray observations of galaxy clusters have detected numerous X-ray cavities, evolved from the interaction of AGN jets with the intracluster medium (ICM) and providing compelling evidence for the importance of jet-mode AGN feedback. Here we argue for the physical importance of the cavity shape, which we characterize with two geometric parameters: radial elongation $τ$ and top wideness $b$. We study the cavity shape with 16 hydrodynamic jet simulations in two representative clusters, and find that the shapes of young cavities are mainly determined by various jet properties. Our simulations successfully reproduce two observed types of young cavities elongated along either the jet ($τ>1$; type-II) or perpendicular ($τ\leq1$; type-I) direction. Bottom-wide type-I cavities are produced by very light internally-subsonic jets, while top-wide type-II cavities are produced by heavier, internally-supersonic jets, which may also produce center-wide cavities with $τ\sim 1$ if the jets are only slightly supersonic. Bottom-wide type-II cavities can be produced by very light jets with very long durations and cylindrical cavities are produced by very light internally-supersonic jets. While not appreciably affecting the shapes of young cavities, viscosity significantly affects the long-term cavity evolution, suppressing both interface instabilities and the formation of torus-like morphology. We encourage observers to study the shapes of young and old X-ray cavities separately, the former probing the properties of AGN jets and the latter potentially probing the ICM viscosity level.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.