Paper detail

The Shape of a Möbius Strip via Elastic Rod Theory Revisited

In 1993 Mahadevan and Keller used the Kirchhoff rod theory to predict the shape of a Möbius band. Starting from the solution for a square cross-section (isotropic), they employ numerical continuation in the cross-sectional aspect ratio in order to approach the solution for a thin strip. Certain smoothly varying configurations are obtained. More recently in 2007, Starostin and van der Heijden pointed out that an actual Möbius band "localizes" into a nearly flat triangular configuration as the ratio of the strip width to center-line circumference is no longer small. Accordingly they return to the developable, thin-plate model of Sadowsky and Wunderlich, obtaining such localized shapes. In this work we strike a middle ground between these two approaches. We employ the standard two-director (special) Cosserat model, and we also use the cross-sectional aspect ratio as a numerical continuation parameter. Nonetheless, we are able to capture both the smoothly varying shapes and the localized, nearly triangular configurations. Our point of departure is that we do not always employ the strength-of-materials formula for the torsional stiffness - a standard feature of the Kirchhoff theory. Our key observation comes from the usual Cosserat ansatz in light of developability, suggesting an increasing torsional stiffness ratio (as well as one increasing bending stiffness ratio) as the thickness becomes small. We demonstrate that the closed-loop configurations we obtain are stable with respect to small perturbations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.