Paper detail

The Separation/Period Gap in the Distribution of Extrasolar Planets around Stars with Masses M >= 1.2 Msolar

The evidence for a shortage of exosolar planets with semimajor axes -1.1 <= log (a/AU) <= -0.2 is investigated. It is shown that this valley results from a gap in the radial distribution of planets, orbiting stars with masses M >= 1.2 Msolar (the high-mass sample, HMS). No underabundance is found for planets orbiting stars with smaller masses. The observational data also indicate that within the HMS population it is preferentially the more massive planets with M sin(i) >= 0.8 M_J that are missing. Monte-Carlo simulations of planet formation and migration are presented that reproduce the observed shortage of planets in the observed radius regime. A dependence on the disk depletion timescale tau_dep is found. The gap is more pronounced for tau_dep = 10^6 - 10^7 yrs than for tau_dep = 3*10^6 - 3*10^7 yrs. This might explain the observed trend with stellar mass if disks around stars with masses M* >= 1.2 Msolar have shorter depletion timescales than those around less massive stars. Possible reasons for such a dependence are a decrease of disk size and an increase of stellar EUV flux with stellar mass.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.