Paper detail

The separate universe problem: 40 years on

The claim that an overdense (positive curvature) region in the early universe cannot extend beyond some maximum scale and remain part of our universe, first made 40 years ago, has recently been questioned by Kopp et al. Their analysis is elucidating and demonstrates that one cannot constrain the form of primordial density perturbations using this argument. However, the notion of a separate-universe scale still applies and it places an important upper limit on the mass of primordial black holes forming at any epoch. We calculate this scale for equations of state of the form $p = k ρc^2$ with $-1 <k < \infty$, refining earlier calculations on account of the Kopp et al. criticisms. For $-1/3 < k < \infty$, the scale is always of order the cosmological particle horizon size, with a numerical factor depending on $k$. This confirms the earlier claim that a primordial black hole cannot be much larger than the particle horizon at formation. For $-1 < k< -1/3$, as expected for some periods in the history of the universe, the situation changes radically, in that a sufficiently large positive-curvature region produces a baby universe rather than a black hole. There is still a separate-universe scale but the interpretation of these solutions requires care.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.